Material advances over the past decades in the recapitulation of natural photosystems have given rise to a series of functional covalent organic frameworks (COFs) for accelerating charge or mass transport. However, there has been a paucity of research addressing the functional zoning and cooperation of charge and mass transport in one COF structure. Here, we demonstrate a desymmetrization strategy that separates electron transfer, proton transport, and CO2 binding regions in one crystalline COF to collaboratively execute artificial photosynthesis. Owing to its unique functional regionalization, the target COF with symmetry-breaking porphyrin moiety (NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF) exhibits an exceptional CO production rate of ~22.7?mmol g?1 h?1, which is ca. 65 times higher than that of the symmetric counterpart (NiN4Por-PDAN-COF). As unveiled by advanced spectroscopies and theoretical analysis, in NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF, the thiophene component facilitates electron transport, metal site binds CO2, and the pyrrole moiety serves as a proton hopping site, “divide and conquer”, to synergistically elevate the conversion efficiency of artificial photosynthesis.
Introduction
In natural photosystem I, chlorophyll P700 is excited followed by the transport of
electrons to the catalytic center Fe2S2 cluster to produce reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate,1,2 which provides a stable charge/mass input for efficient CO2 fixing and chemical manufacturing (Calvin-Benson cycle).3 Basically, the unique Fe4S4 redox protein clusters offer a robust structural foundation for the electron transfer,4 diverse amino acid residues (e.g., Cys/Glu/Ser, etc.) promote the efficient proton
transport,5 while the ribulose bisphosphate provides an alkaline site for CO2 binding (Figure?1a)6,7 and functional regionalization, which synergistically contributes to the highly efficient
CO2 photoconversion. Fascinated by the delicate structures and efficient processes of
natural photosynthesis, substantial endeavors have been devoted to exploiting artificial
structures to recapitulate the biological charge/mass transfer processes.8–13 Covalent organic frameworks (COFs), characterized by their covalently linked skeletons,
high crystallinity, and precise chemical structures, have held great promise in artificial
photosynthesis.14–17 For example, state-of-the-art COFs have achieved (1) highly efficient electron transfer
with a build-in field,18 D-π-A configuration,19,20 redox junction,21 metal anchoring,22,23 and delocalized π-configuration;24–26 (2) remarkable proton conductivities and proton-coupled electron transfer with sulfonic,27 imidazole,28 pyrrole,29 etc.; and (3) excellent CO2 adsorption with an amino environment,30,31 various metal sites,32–34 and unique porous structure.35 Despite this progress, a significant challenge remains in uniting the rapid transport
of electrons, protons, and CO2 in one COF while realizing the collaborative functional regionalization of the three
processes.
Figure 1 | (a)?Schematic illustration of functional regionalization in natural photosynthesis.
(b)?Artificial photosynthesis via COFs, including conventional (top) and desymmetrized
(bottom) porphyrins.
Metal porphyrins and their derivatives, with delocalized π-electron tetrapyrrolic structures,36,37 provide a molecularly precise platform for CO2 binding38,39 and charge transport (electron relay).40 Nevertheless, the highly symmetric structure of the conventional porphyrins limits the directionality of electron and proton transport, thereby constraining the enhancement of artificial photosynthesis activity (Figure?1b top). Recent reports in the field of small molecules have demonstrated that porphyrin desymmetrization (e.g., O doping,41N-confused configuration42) can regulate the kinetics and/or thermodynamics of CO2 reduction. Drawing inspiration from these findings, it is promising to leverage the inherent merits of COFs in charge and mass transport by employing a desymmetrization strategy to modulate the directional charge and mass transport in COF toward higher catalytic performance. Taking the substitution of one pyrrole with thiophene in porphyrin as an example, three advantages can be achieved: (1) the more aromatic thiophene ring, with its available d-orbitals,43,44 can serve as a bridge for electron transport; (2) S atom in thiophene acts as an electron donor (ED),45 which increases the charge density of metal site to promote CO2 binding; (3) the difference in electronegativity between thiophene S and pyrrole N creates a variation in the gradient of the charge density, which can be exploited to achieve the spatial separation of the electron and proton transport channels (Figure?1b bottom). However, the construction of crystalline COFs incorporating desymmetrized porphyrin moieties remains an enormous synthetic challenge in this field, which is highly desirable, yet rarely reported.
Herein, as a proof-of-concept, we construct a crystalline COF with a well-defined metal-thiophene-tripyrrole (NiSN3Por) moiety via the Knoevenagel condensation reaction. As expected, this unique symmetry-breaking NiSN3Por configuration exhibits excellent performance in photocatalytic CO2 conversion. When compared with the D4h symmetric NiN4Por-PDAN-COF, the photocatalytic CO generation rate of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF is increased by ~65 times under visible light conditions (xenon lamp, λ?>?420?nm). In-depth mechanistic investigations reveal that the NiSN3Por moiety in COF is endowed with a clear division of labor including thiophene as an electron transport region, pyrrole as a proton conduction channel, and metal site as a CO2 binding site, which cooperatively facilitates the performance of CO2 photoconversion.
Experimental Methods
Synthesis of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF
A pyrex tube was charged with Ni–SN3(Cl)Por-CHO (16.74?mg, 0.02?mmol), p-phenylenediacetonitrile (PDAN) (9.37?mg, 0.06?mmol), o-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) (1?mL), acetonitrile (ACN) (2?μL), and aqueous 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) (100?μL, 5?M). After being degassed through three freeze-pump-thaw cycles and then sealed under vacuum, the tube was heated at 80?°C for 5?days. The resulting precipitate was collected by filtration, exhaustively washed by Soxhlet extraction with tetrahydrofuran (THF) and dichloromethane (DCM) for 24?h, and dried under vacuum at 80?°C. The product was isolated as a black powder (18.34?mg, 85.1% yield).
Synthesis of NiN4Por-PDAN-COF
A pyrex tube was charged with Ni–N4Por-CHO (15.66?mg, 0.02?mmol), PDAN (9.37?mg, 0.06?mmol), o-DCB (2?mL), ACN (10?μL), and aqueous DBU (100?μL, 5?M). After being degassed through three freeze-pump-thaw cycles and then sealed under vacuum, the tube was heated at 120?°C for 7?days. The resulting precipitate was collected by filtration, exhaustively washed by Soxhlet extraction with THF and DCM for 24?h, and dried under vacuum at 80?°C. The product was isolated as a red powder (17.01?mg, 83.2% yield).
Photocatalytic experiments
Photocatalytic CO2 reduction experiments were carried out in ~15?mL glass tubes (Agilent Technologies Co. Ltd, China) with COF (1?mg), triethylamine (TEA) (1?mL), Ru(bpy)3Cl2 (6.5?mg), and 2,2′-bipyridine (15?mg) in 5?mL pure water. The solution was bubbled with CO2 (1?atm) for 30?min. Four hundred microliters of CH4 (20.01% in N2) were injected into the system and functioned as the internal standard for quantitative analysis. Then the system was subjected to irradiation under 465?nm light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (~20?mW/cm2). The gaseous products in the headspace of the tubes were probed by gas chromatography (GC), and the liquid products for CO2 reduction were examined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Further optimized CO2 photoreduction experiments were carried out in ~15?mL glass tubes (Agilent Company) with COF (0.5?mg), Ru(bpy)3Cl2 (10?mg), 2,2′-bipyridine (5?mg), and 50?mg dimethylphenyl benzimidazoline (BIH) in a mixture of 5?mL ACN and 1?mL water. The system was subjected to irradiation under an Xe lamp with a 420?nm filter.
Density functional theory calculations
The initial crystal structure of the COFs with overlapping (AA) stacking was constructed through the Materials Visualizer BIOVIA Materials Studio 2019 (19.2), and then these structures together with the cells were optimized with the generalized gradient approximation Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional and double numerical-polarized basis set (4.4 version) adopting Effective Core Potentials with DMol3 module of BIOVIA Material Studio 2019 software.
The lattice constants of the COFs were optimized to 26.043?×?26.043?×?4.065?? (α?=?β?=?γ?=?90°) for the NiN4Por-PDAN-COF, and 25.691?×?25.691?×?4.715?? (α?=?β?=?γ?=?90°) for the NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF. The convergence criteria for structure optimization and energy calculation were set as: self-consistent field (SCF) tolerance (1?×?10?5?Ha), energy tolerance (2?×?10?5?Ha), a maximum force tolerance (4?×?10?5?Ha/?), and maximum displacement tolerance (5?×?10?5??).
Additional materials, synthetic procedures, and calculation details can be found in the Supporting Information.
Results and Discussion
The target COF (NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF) and its symmetric counterpart (NiN4Por-PDAN-COF) were synthesized from aldehyde monomers using the Knoevenagel condensation
reaction (Figure?2a, see detailed synthetic procedures in Supporting Information Figures S1–S4). Herein, PDAN was employed as a bridging unit to introduce C=C bonds in the COF
to guarantee a higher charge transfer efficiency.46 Notably, axial Cl? as an anion, binds with Ni in an ionic bond state,41 which separates from the Ni center before contacting with CO2 (vide infra). The chemical structure of obtained COFs was first assessed by a combination
of Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and solid-state NMR (ssNMR) spectroscopy.
From the FT-IR spectra, compared with the two monomers (NiN4Por-CHO and NiSN3Por-CHO), the peaks of two COFs at ~1670?cm?1 were significantly decreased, while the signals at ~3025 and ~2216?cm?1 appeared, indicating that –CHO is converted into a –CH=C(CN)– group ( Supporting Information Figure S5).47,48 Additionally, in ssNMR spectra ( Supporting Information Figure S6), the disappearance of the –CHO signal and the emergence of the –CN signal confirm
again the formation of the –CH=C(CN)– unit. From thermogravimetric analysis, both
COFs are thermally stable above 260?°C ( Supporting Information Figure S7).
Figure 2 | (a)?Synthetic scheme for NiN4Por-PDAN-COF and NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF by Knoevenagel condensation reaction. (b)?Proposed stacking structures
for different thiophene orientations and the corresponding relative energy changes
(c)?and (d)?Experimental, Rietveld refinement, and simulated para-site stacking PXRD patterns of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF. (e)?Top and (f)?side view of the structural model of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF (green ball: Ni; yellow: S; blue: N; gray: C; purple: Cl; and white:
H).
Then, structural simulation combined with powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analysis was employed to determine the stacking patterns of both COFs. Considering the variability of the thiophene and pyrrole structures, we established three possible patterns of stacking, that is, direct S–S interaction between the two layers, S interaction with ortho-site, and S interaction with para-site (Figure?2b). Geometry optimization results show that the stacking mode corresponding to S with a para-site exhibits the lowest energy, that is, a staggered-like pattern for the thiophene structure in the porphyrin COF stacking is the most stable (Figure?2c). Experimentally, the PXRD pattern of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF exhibits main peaks at ~3.5°, 7.0°, and 10.5°, corresponding to the (100), (200), and (300) crystal facets, respectively. After Rietveld refinement, the corresponding para-site NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF pattern well matches with the experimental data, with final Rwp and Rp values converging to 3.91% and 2.80%, respectively (Figure?2d and Supporting Information Figure S8). Similarly, the symmetric counterpart (NiN4Por-PDAN-COF) exhibits an AA stacking model, with Rwp and Rp values of 2.23% and 1.77%, respectively ( Supporting Information Figures S9 and S10). We also conducted a nitrogen sorption isotherm measurement for both COFs at 77?K to investigate their porous properties. Pore size evaluation from the isotherms of both COFs shows a main peak centered at ~2.7?nm ( Supporting Information Figure S11), which is consistent with the calculated pore diameter (diagonal measurement in Figure?2e,f).
To gain a deep understanding of the microstructure of the two COFs, scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) was conducted. SEM images reveal that these two COFs are endowed
with the same morphology of stacked sheets ( Supporting Information Figure S12). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) analysis provides more
accurate structures of the two COFs. As described in Figure?3a,b, an interplanar spacing of 2.6?nm is identified, indicating the (100) crystal facet
of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COFs. In addition, the porous character of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF can be clearly observed, which is in good agreement with the structural
simulation results (Figure?3b). Similar TEM results for NiN4Por-PDAN-COF are presented in Supporting Information Figure S13. Furthermore, high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy
(HAADF-STEM) was employed to analyze the main elemental distribution of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF. As shown in Figure?3c, the S, N, and Ni elements are evenly distributed on the 2D plane. High-resolution
image shows that the high-bright spots are homogeneously distributed in the COFs (Figure?3d). Combined with electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) analysis (Figure?3e), we can confirm that the isolated Ni atoms are uniformly anchored in the COF structure,
without the formation of Ni clusters during the COF growth. In addition, the total
Ni content in NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF and NiN4Por-PDAN-COF is determined to be 5.13 and 5.51?wt %, respectively, by inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry, which matches well with the theoretical
values ( Supporting Information Table S1).
Figure 3 | (a)?TEM image of the NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF. (b)?The enlarged HR-TEM image of the orange box region in (a). (c)?Energy-dispersive
spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping of N, S, and Ni. (d)?Aberration corrected HAADF-STEM
image and (e)?EELS curve of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF sample. (f)?Ni K-edge XANES spectra. (g)?Magnitude of the k2-weighted Fourier transform of the Ni K-edge. The corresponding CCWT contour plots
of (h)?Ni foil, (i)?anhydrous NiCl2, (j)?NiN4Por-PDAN-COF, and (k)?NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF.
To deeply investigate the electronic and spatial configurations of catalytic sites in both COFs, synchrotron radiation X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) was performed. As portrayed in Figure?3f, the intensity of the pre-edge peak for NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF in X-ray absorption near edge structure spectra (XANES), originating from electronic transitions from the 1s to 3d orbitals, obviously increased, while the shoulder peak at ~8339?eV (1s to 4pz transition) decreased compared with the symmetric structures (NiN4Por-PDAN-COF), indicating that the D4h symmetry of the coordination environment around Ni atom is broken.41 Meanwhile, compared with NiN4Por-PDAN-COF, the white line intensity of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF decreases, illustrating that the charge density around Ni is increased. In addition, by means of quadratic differential analysis for the absorption edge ( Supporting Information Figure S14), the average oxidation number of NiSN3 is lower than that of the NiN4 structure, also verifying that the charge density increased around Ni atoms for NiSN3 configuration. Combining the changes in the intensity of the pre-edge peak, absorption edge, and white line peak, we can conclude that the introduction of S atoms not only destroys the D4h symmetry of Ni coordination environment, but also increases the charge density of the catalytic sites.
In the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) region, compared with the NiN4 structure, the amplitude for NiSN3 in k-space spectra decreases, illustrating that the coordination number for the Ni atom is reduced ( Supporting Information Figure S15). Fourier transform R-space analysis shows that the main peak of NiSN3 at ~1.5??, which is attributed to Ni–N single scattering, declines compared with the NiN4 counterpart, also illustrating that coordination number in the first coordination layer (Ni–N) decreases. Meanwhile, the peak at ~2.0?? appears, which can be ascribed to Ni–S and Ni–Cl bonds. Additionally, no characteristic peak of Ni–Ni (at ~2.2??) is observed for both NiN4 and NiSN3 structures, suggesting that the isolated Ni atoms are atomically dispersed in the porphyrinic skeletons (Figure?3g). The detailed quantitative fitting results ( Supporting Information Figure S16 and Table S2) further confirm the configurations of both COFs. Compared with NiN4, the distance of the Ni–N bond for NiSN3 decreases from 1.93 to 1.82??. This phenomenon is due to the compression of the Ni–N bond by the bulky S atoms. Continuous Cauchy wavelet transform (CCWT) analysis by combination of both k and R space provides more information on the coordination environments of Ni sites.49 Taking Ni foil at a maximum of ~7.6???1 as a Ni–Ni bond standard, no signal can be observed at this position for both NiN4 and NiSN3 structures, further confirming atomically dispersed Ni sites. Obviously, the maximum corresponding vector k position in CCWT of NiSN3 shifts slightly to a lower wavenumber compared with the NiN4 structure (Figure?3h–k). This result is observed because of a decreasing bond length between Ni and N, which is well consistent with the above EXAFS fitting result.
The performance of photocatalytic CO2 conversion of both COFs was then investigated with [Ru(bpy)3Cl2] as a photosensitizer (PS) and TEA as an electron donor (ED) in pure water with 1?atm
CO2 under 465?±?5?nm LED light irradiation (~20?mW cm?2). Excitingly, compared with the symmetric structure (NiN4Por-PDAN-COF), the CO generation rate of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF increases more than 27.6 times, and the corresponding CO generation rate
is calculated as 713.8?μmol g?1 h?1 with a selectivity of 90.4%, albeit in a pure water environment (Figure?4a). The control experiments of the photocatalytic system are discussed in Supporting Information Figure S17. It illustrates that the light source, PS, COF catalyst, and ED are all necessary
for the light reaction system. Noticeably, a negligible CO signal can be detected
in the absence of Ru(bpy)3Cl2, indicating the cocatalyst nature of two COFs in the photocatalytic CO2-to-CO conversion.38,50 Compared with NiSN3Por-CHO and PDAN monomers, the activity and selectivity of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF for CO generation are improved, which may be attributed to the inherent
merits of COF with favored charge and mass transport (Figure?4b). This conclusion can also be inferred from the NiN4Por-PDAN-COF catalytic system ( Supporting Information Figure S18). With the aid of 1H-NMR and GC-flame ionization detector (FID) analysis, there is no signal of CH3OH or HCOOH, and only a trace amount of CH4 is observed ( Supporting Information Figure S19), verifying that the system scarcely produces HCOOH, CH3OH, or CH4 from CO2 photoconversion. In addition, we examined the catalytic stability of the system for
NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF. After three catalytic cycles (10?h?×?3), the activity for CO production
is well maintained (Figure?4c). Moreover, the FT-IR spectra ( Supporting Information Figure S20) and PXRD patterns ( Supporting Information Figure S21) of the recovered NiN4Por-PDAN-COF and NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF after 30?h reveal that the chemical structure and the crystalline structure
are maintained during the photocatalysis, indicating its excellent stability. Furthermore,
we performed a 13C labeling test by using 13CO2 as the C-source. The products are almost completely converted into 13CO (m/z?=?29) for NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF (Figure?4d), confirming that the CO product is indeed generated from reactant CO2, instead of PS, COF catalyst, or ED.
Figure 4 | (a)?Photocatalytic evolutions of CO and H2 by NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF and NiN4Por-PDAN-COF taking Ru(bpy)3Cl2 as the PSs in water. (b)?Comparison of photocatalytic CO and H2 evolution by PDAN, NiSN3Por-CHO monomer, NiSN3Por-CHO/PDAN mixture, or as-formed NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF as the catalyst. (c)?Long-time photocatalytic CO evolution test for NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF. (d)?Mass spectrum for photocatalytic reduction of 13CO2 to 13CO using NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF as a catalyst. (e)?Photocatalytic evolutions of CO and H2 with BIH as an ED and ACN/H2O as solvents. (f)?Practical performance based on the NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF under natural sunlight and the corresponding power density record.
To further elevate the photocatalytic performance, ACN with good CO2 solubility and electron-donating reagent dimethylphenyl BIH were introduced into the system. Under a xenon-lamp condition (λ?>?420?nm), the CO production rate of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF reaches 22.6?mmol g?1 h?1 with a selectivity of 92.2%, which is comparable with the reported COF cocatalysts ( Supporting Information Table S3). In contrast to the NiN4Por counterpart, the CO generation rate was elevated by ~65 times for NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF (Figure?4e). Inspired by the satisfactory result, the realistic sunlight condition was adopted. On a cloudy day (May 17th, ~24?°C) with 4?h of illumination, CO production reached ~19.7?mmol g?1, indicating natural sunlight can be employed for CO2 photoconversion with good effect (Figure?4f).
Considering the cocatalyst nature of both COFs (vide ante), the electrochemical techniques and theoretical calculations were then performed to study the electron transfer processes of the catalytic systems. In the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves, quasi-reversible waves were observed, and the corresponding half-wave potentials (E1/2) for NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF and NiN4Por-PDAN-COF were calculated as ?0.65 and ?0.63?V (vs normal hydrogen electrode) respectively, both higher than the potential of Ru*(II/III) (?0.84?V) in water. These results suggest that the electron transfer from the excited state of Ru(bpy)32+ to the two COFs is thermodynamically feasible ( Supporting Information Figure S22). To investigate the number of electrons transferred per lattice unit of COFs, a combination of normal pulse voltammetry (NPV) and diffusion-ordered 1H-NMR spectroscopy was employed ( Supporting Information Figure S23).51,52 For a NiN4Por monomer, the number of electrons transferred is calculated as ~1.80 at ?1.23?V (vs Ag/AgCl), demonstrating that each reduction event in the NiN4Por-COF unit is associated with a two-electron reduction process.53 Interestingly, for a NiSN3Por monomer, CV and NPV show two obvious waves, which can be calculated as ~0.98 and ~1.90 electrons transferred at ?0.20 and ?0.76?V (vs Ag/AgCl), attributing to the Cl? shedding and two-electron extraction behaviors, respectively. The difference between the electrochemical processes of the monomer and COF may be assigned to the highly conjugated structure in COF, which allows the two electrochemical processes in COF to overlap. Guided by electron transfer investigation, the detailed catalytic cycles for NiN4Por-PDAN-COF and NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF are shown in Supporting Information Figure S24. Upon visible-light irradiation, Ru(II) is excited followed by the transfer of electrons to the catalytic centers. For NiN4Por-PDAN-COF, each structural unit harvests two electrons, subsequently combining with H+ and CO2 to generate Ni-COOH species. For NiSN3-PDAN-COF, each structural cell can capture three electrons, the first electron is inputted accompanied by the removal of Cl? to generate [NiSN3Por-PDAN]0, followed by the two-electron injection to form [NiSN3Por-PDAN]2? intermediate species, further reacting with H+ and CO2 to produce Ni-COOH species. Finally, *COOH undergoes another H+ transfer process to generate *CO. Noticeably, Cl?-removed [NiSN3Por-PDAN]0 as an initial cocatalyst is involved in the catalytic cycle. Both COFs experience EEC (E?=?electron transfer, C?=?chemical reaction)54 rather than ECE processes.
Femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (fs-TAS) was employed to evaluate the ligand-to-metal site electron transfer rates. As
depicted in Figure?5a,b, the contour map of fs-TAS shows that the kinetic behavior lasts ~1000?ps for the NiN4Por structure, while the NiSN3Por decays within ~50?ps. For the detailed analysis of fs-TAS for NiN4Por, the peaks at 430, 520, and 550?nm correspond to the S2 state, Q-band ground-state bleaching (GSB), and S1 state kinetic events, respectively (Figure?5c).55 For NiSN3Por counterpart, the peaks at 460, 510, 560, and 580?nm represent the B-band GSB,
S2 state, Q-band GSB, and S1 state kinetic behaviors, respectively (Figure?5d). As the electron transport goes through the ligand-unoccupied orbital to reach the
metal catalytic site, the S1 state kinetic decay is analyzed in detail (Figure?5e) and the results of the two-exponential fit are summarized in Supporting Information Table S4. Referring to the reported metal porphyrin description,56 the short-lived parameter corresponds to the ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT)
transition and the long-lived result represents the metal-to-ligand charge transfer
(MLCT) process. Therefore, compared to the NiN4Por structure, both the LMCT and MLCT events are substantially accelerated for NiSN3Por (Figure?5f). Correspondingly, the steady-state and transient photoluminescence intensities of
Ru(bpy)3Cl2 are more effectively quenched by introducing NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF as a cocatalyst, further indicating that the Ni center in NiSN3Por moiety displays a higher photoelectron extraction efficiency than that of the
NiN4Por counterpart ( Supporting Information Figure S25). Additionally, from the photocurrent response analysis, a higher photocurrent density
is observed for NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF under identical conditions ( Supporting Information Figure S26a), indicating that the transfer efficiency of electrons is higher than that of NiN4Por-PDAN-COF. Moreover, the NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF electrode exhibits a smaller resistance in electrochemical impedance
spectroscopy (EIS) measurements compared with the NiN4Por-PDAN-COF ( Supporting Information Figure S26b and Table S5), thereby contributing to the more feasible electron transport behavior.
Figure 5 | fs-TAS counter maps for NiN4Por (a)?and NiSN3Por (b). fs-TAS full spectra of NiN4Por (c)?and NiSN3Por (d), and the corresponding kinetics decay profiles of S1 state (e), recorded with 400?nm excitation, dispersed in toluene. (f)?Schematic illustrations
of dynamic processes of NiN4Por and NiSN3Por. (g)?d orbital-related PDOS curves of NiN4Por (left) and NiSN3Por (right). (h)?Schematic diagrams of transport pathways of excited electrons in
pyrrole-Ni (left) and thiophene-Ni (right) moieties.
To gain a deeper understanding of the reasons behind the accelerated LMCT process with NiSN3Por configuration, the orbital-related projected density of state (PDOS) calculations were dissected in detail (Figure?5g). For NiN4Por, the unoccupied dx2-y2 orbitals dominate above the Fermi energy level and the splitting energy value is calculated as 1.257?eV between the dx2-y2 and dz2 orbitals. On the contrary, when thiophene replaces a pyrrole ring, the dx2-y2 orbitals are broadened and part of the region appears on the Fermi energy level. At the same time, the splitting energy value between the dx2-y2 and dz2 orbital decreases to 0.287?eV, leading the NiSN3 structure to exhibit a conductor-like property (i.e., higher electronic conductivity). Inspired by the fs-TAS and PDOS analysis, a clear electron transport pathway is illustrated (Figure?5h). Compared to NiN4Por, thiophene in NiSN3Por possesses a unique S d-orbital41,42 involved in the porphyrin conjugation and acts as a high-speed tunnel, thereby accelerating the LMCT process. Meanwhile, the decrease in splitting energy also contributes to the d-electron transition process, which further facilitates electron injection into CO2 molecules.
Furthermore, proton transport serves as another key factor for artificial photosynthesis.
Mulliken charge analysis shows that the S atom in thiophene moiety exhibits a positive
value while the N atom in pyrrole presents a negative result, illustrating that the
S atom and N atom behave electrophilicity and nucleophilicity (i.e., H+ adsorption), respectively (Figure?6a,b). Electrostatic potential (ESP) distributions exhibit an electrostatic barrier forming
around the central metal for NiN4Por, which hinders the electron transfer from the macrocyclic ligand to the metal
site. In contrast, for the NiSN3Por structure, the thiophene moiety breaks through the electrostatic barrier and generates
a high-speed channel for electron transport. Meanwhile, the remaining three pyrrole
structures in NiSN3 moiety form an electron-rich domain that offers targets for proton migration (Figure?6c). To unveil the reason behind this phenomenon, Bader charge analysis was employed
to evaluate the electronic gains and losses. It is found that the introduction of
S can effectively increase the charge density of central Ni and the remaining N atoms
( Supporting Information Figure S27). This result illustrates that electron-donating S in the thiophene creates a charge
density gradient difference in the (δ+)S–Ni–N(δ?) configuration as well as maintains a high charge density around Ni, which well corresponds
to the above XANES analysis (vide supra).
Figure 6 | (a)?Mulliken charge variation of thiophene-Ni and pyrrole-Ni moieties, and the corresponding
structural models. (b)?and (c)?ESP diagrams of NiN4Por-PDAN and NiSN3Por-PDAN model compounds, where the red represents the electron-rich region and blue
stands for the electron-poor domain. (d)?Geometry optimization of COOH with different
orientations on the NiN4Por and NiSN3Por moieties (for clarity, the rest of the porphyrin ring is omitted), and the corresponding
Gibbs free energy diagrams of CO2 conversion pathways (e)?and (f)?The differential charge density of COOH with NiN4Por (top) and NiSN3Por (bottom) fragments, where red represents electron accumulation and blue represents
electron depletion. (g)?The change of in-situ FT-IR spectra of NiSN3Por-PDAN-COFs (orange lines) and NiN4Por-PDAN-COFs (blue lines) in D2O under 465?nm light irradiation.
Guided by the above results, H atom and CO2 adsorption events on different sites were carefully simulated. Taking NiN4Por structure as a reference, the adsorption energy of H at the S site is the highest, which means that the S site has a strong repulsion with H. On the contrary, H interacts ortho- and para-N with lower adsorption energies. Specifically, H on the para-N endows the most stable structure, that is, H prefers to adsorb on the para-N site ( Supporting Information Figure S28). Moreover, CO2 favors the S–N orientation on the NiSN3 configuration from the energy analysis ( Supporting Information Figure S29). Inspired by the adsorption behaviors of H and CO2, we calculated the adsorption energy of the key intermediate COOH with different orientations (Figure?6d). As a result, the *COOH energies match well with the above H and CO2 adsorption behaviors. That is, H prefers to interact with CO2 from the para-pyrrole side, thus CO2 can be smoothly converted to COOH via this pathway (Figure?6e). Moreover, the differential charge density of COOH with the catalytic site was analyzed to verify this event (Figure?6f). Compared with the NiN4Por-COOH assembly, COOH on the NiSN3Por presents more electron accumulation and depletion processes, indicating again that COOH formation is favored on the NiSN3Por moiety. Additionally, compared to the electron-rich region of pyrrole N in NiN4Por, the electron-poor region of thiophene S acts as an electron channel to accelerate electron transfer, while the electron-rich domain in para-pyrrole N contributes to the H+ migration. As a consequence, these three processes, that is, electron transfer, proton transport, and CO2 binding, are spatially separated and functionally regionalized to synergistically promote CO2 to CO conversion. In contrast, COOH on the NiN4Por with a uniform structure provides a lack of target points that hinders the directional migration of protons and electrons, resulting in sluggish COOH formation.
Experimentally, FT-IR spectroscopy was employed to verify the aforementioned density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Here, to reduce the interference of H2O on the infrared window, we used D2O as a reactant to study the change in infrared spectra.57 As shown in Figure?6g, the signal at ~1450 and 1660?cm?1 is assigned to *COOD, and the signal at ~2010?cm?1 is attributed to *CO. Remarkably, it can be found that the increased rate of *COOD signals on the NiSN3Por-PDAN-COF surface is much faster than that of the NiN4 counterpart with the same extension of illumination time. This phenomenon indicates that the NiSN3 asymmetric structure is more conducive to forming Ni-COOH intermediate, thereby significantly accelerating the CO2-to-CO reaction process, which matches well with the above theoretical models of collaboratively functional regionalization.
Conclusions
In summary, mimicking natural photosynthesis, we reported a desymmetrization strategy in porphyrinic COF that segregates electron transfer, proton transport, and CO2 binding domains to realize their respective functions. Compared with the conventional D4h symmetric NiN4-typed COF, this unique symmetry-breaking NiSN3 unit in COF photoconverts CO2 to CO with higher activity and selectivity. Further advanced spectroscopy and DFT thermodynamics calculations unveiled that, in NiSN3Por-typed COF, the thiophene region bears the responsibility of the fast electron channel, the pyrrole moiety plays the role of the proton hopping target, and the metal acts as the CO2 binding site. These three regions are spatially separated but yet work in tandem to promote CO2 photoconversion. We anticipate that the desymmetrization principle demonstrated in our system can offer a paradigm to develop other COFs for more accurate recapitulation of natural biological processes and applications in challenging artificial fields (e.g., H2O oxidation, O2 reduction, N2 reduction, etc.).
Supporting Information
Supporting Information is available and includes materials, synthetic procedures, construction of COFs, additional characterizations, CO2 reduction control experiments, detailed DFT calculations, and NMR data of relevant monomers including Figures S1–S38 and Tables S1–S5 where Figures S30–S38 are the NMR of the monomer.
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest to report.
Funding Information
This research was made possible as a result of a generous grant from Research Grants Council (RGC) Senior Research Fellowship Scheme (grant no. SRFS2021-5S01), the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (PolyU 15307321), Research Institute for Smart Energy (CDAQ), Research Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (CE2H), Miss Clarea Au for the Endowed Professorship in Energy (847?S), National Key R&D Program of China (grant nos. 2022YFA1502903 and 2022YFA0911900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 22309156, 22088102 and 21971251), and the New Cornerstone Science Foundation.
Acknowledgments
We also thank the Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Beamline 1W1B) for providing beam time for the XAS measurements, and acknowledge the University Research Facility in Life Sciences (ULS) for affording matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry tests.
References
- 1. Schilter D.; Camara J. M.; Huynh M. T.; Hammes-Schiffer S.; Rauchfuss T. B.Hydrogenase Enzymes and Their Synthetic Models: The Role of Metal Hydrides.Chem. Rev.2016, 116, 8693–8749. Google Scholar
- 2. Gray H. B.Powering the Planet with Solar Fuel.Nat. Chem.2009, 1, 7. Google Scholar
- 3. Sharkey T. D.Discovery of the Canonical Calvin–Benson Cycle.Photosynth. Res.2019, 140, 235–252. Google Scholar
- 4. Simmons T. R.; Berggren G.; Bacchi M.; Fontecave M.; Artero V.Mimicking Hydrogenases: From Biomimetics to Artificial Enzymes.Coord. Chem. Rev.2014, 270–271, 127–150. Google Scholar
- 5. Wu Z.; Alibay I.; Newstead S.; Biggin P. C.Proton Control of Transitions in an Amino Acid Transporter.Biophys. J.2019, 117, 1342–1351. Google Scholar
- 6. Frolov E. N.; Kublanov I. V.; Toshchakov S. V.; Lunev E. A.; Pimenov N. V.; Bonch-Osmolovskaya E. A.; Lebedinsky A. V.; Chernyh N. A.Form III Rubisco-Mediated Transaldolase Variant of the Calvin Cycle in a Chemolithoautotrophic Bacterium.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.2019, 116, 18638–18646. Google Scholar
- 7. Szecowka M.; Heise R.; Tohge T.; Nunes-Nesi A.; Vosloh D.; Huege J.; Feil R.; Lunn J.; Nikoloski Z.; Stitt M.; Fernie A. R.; Arrivault S.Metabolic Fluxes in an Illuminated Arabidopsis Rosette.Plant Cell2013, 25, 694–714. Google Scholar
- 8. Armstrong F. A.Copying Biology’s Ways with Hydrogen.Science2013, 339, 658–659. Google Scholar
- 9. Eberhart M. S.; Bowers L. M. R.; Shan B.; Troian-Gautier L.; Brennaman M. K.; Papanikolas J. M.; Meyer T. J.Completing a Charge Transport Chain for Artificial Photosynthesis.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2018, 140, 9823–9826. Google Scholar
- 10. Kim D.; Sakimoto K. K.; Hong D.; Yang P.Artificial Photosynthesis for Sustainable Fuel and Chemical Production.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2015, 54, 3259–3266. Google Scholar
- 11. Dong Y.; Duchesne P.; Mohan A.; Ghuman K. K.; Kant P.; Hurtado L.; Ulmer U.; Loh J. Y. Y.; Tountas A. A.; Wang L.; Jelle A.; Xia M.; Dittmeyer R.; Ozin G. A.Shining Light on CO2: From Materials Discovery to Photocatalyst, Photoreactor and Process Engineering.Chem. Soc. Rev.2020, 49, 5648–5663. Google Scholar
- 12. Gao P.; Zhong L.; Han B.; He M.; Sun Y.Green Carbon Science: Keeping the Pace in Practice.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2022, 61, e202210095. Google Scholar
- 13. Wagner A.; Sahm C. D.; Reisner E.Towards Molecular Understanding of Local Chemical Environment Effects in Electro- and Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction.Nat. Catal.2020, 3, 775–786. Google Scholar
- 14. Li Z.; He T.; Gong Y.; Jiang D.Covalent Organic Frameworks: Pore Design and Interface Engineering.Acc. Chem. Res.2020, 53, 1672–1685. Google Scholar
- 15. Gao S.; Zhang Q.; Su X.; Wu X.; Zhang X.-G.; Guo Y.; Li Z.; Wei J.; Wang H.; Zhang S.; Wang J.Ingenious Artificial Leaf based on Covalent Organic Framework Membranes for Boosting CO2 Photoreduction.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2023, 145, 9520–9529. Google Scholar
- 16. Zhang Y.; Liu H.; Gao F.; Tan X.; Cai Y.; Hu B.; Huang Q.; Fang M.; Wang X.Application of MOFs and COFs for Photocatalysis in CO2 Reduction, H2 Generation, and Environmental Treatment.EnergyChem2022, 4, 100078. Crossref,?Google Scholar
- 17. Qiao S.; Di M.; Jiang J.-X.; Han B.-H.Conjugated Porous Polymers for Photocatalysis: The Road from Catalytic Mechanism, Molecular Structure to Advanced Applications.EnergyChem2022, 4, 100094. Google Scholar
- 18. Tian X.; Huang X.; Shi J.-W.; Zhou J.; Guo C.; Wang R.; Wang Y.-R.; Lu M.; Li Q.; Chen Y.; Li S.-L.; Lan Y.-Q.Implanting Built-In Electric Field in Heterometallic Phthalocyanine Covalent Organic Frameworks for Light-Assisted CO2 Electroreduction.CCS Chem.2023, 5, 2557–2566. Link,?Google Scholar
- 19. Lan X.; Li H.; Liu Y.; Zhang Y.; Zhang T.; Chen Y.Covalent Organic Framework with Donor1-Acceptor-Donor2 Motifs Regulating Local Charge of Intercalated Single Cobalt Sites for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Syngas.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2024, 63, e202407092. Google Scholar
- 20. Li W.; Huang X.; Zeng T.; Liu Y. A.; Hu W.; Yang H.; Zhang Y.-B.; Wen K.Thiazolo[5,4-d]thiazole-Based Donor–Acceptor Covalent Organic Framework for Sunlight-Driven Hydrogen Evolution.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2021, 60, 1869–1874. Google Scholar
- 21. Li Q.; Chang J.-N.; Wang Z.; Lu M.; Guo C.; Zhang M.; Yu T.-Y.; Chen Y.; Li S.-L.; Lan Y.-Q.Modulated Connection Modes of Redox Units in Molecular Junction Covalent Organic Frameworks for Artificial Photosynthetic Overall Reaction.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2023, 145, 23167–23175. Google Scholar
- 22. Ran L.; Li Z.; Ran B.; Cao J.; Zhao Y.; Shao T.; Song Y.; Leung M. K. H.; Sun L.; Hou J.Engineering Single-Atom Active Sites on Covalent Organic Frameworks for Boosting CO2 Photoreduction.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2022, 144, 17097–17109. Google Scholar
- 23. Yang S.; Hu W.; Zhang X.; He P.; Pattengale B.; Liu C.; Cendejas M.; Hermans I.; Zhang X.; Zhang J.; Huang J.2D Covalent Organic Frameworks as Intrinsic Photocatalysts for Visible Light-Driven CO2 Reduction.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2018, 140, 14614–14618. Google Scholar
- 24. He C.; Tao S.; Liu R.; Zhi Y.; Jiang D.Covalent Organic Frameworks: Linkage Chemistry and its Critical Role in the Evolution of π Electronic Structures and Functions.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2024, 63, e202403472. Google Scholar
- 25. Cheng Y.-Z.; Ji W.; Hao P.-Y.; Qi X.-H.; Wu X.; Dou X.-M.; Bian X.-Y.; Jiang D.; Li F.-T.; Liu X.-F.; Yang D.-H.; Ding X.; Han B.-H.A Fully Conjugated Covalent Organic Framework with Oxidative and Reductive Sites for Photocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction with Water.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2023, 62, e202308523. Google Scholar
- 26. Zhang Z.; Zhang Z.; Chen C.; Wang R.; Xie M.; Wan S.; Zhang R.; Cong L.; Lu H.; Han Y.; Xing W.; Shi Z.; Feng S.Single-Atom Platinum with Asymmetric Coordination Environment on Fully Conjugated Covalent Organic Framework for Efficient Electrocatalysis.Nat. Commun.2024, 15, 2556. Google Scholar
- 27. Li L.; Lv X.; Xue Y.; Shao H.; Zheng G.; Han Q.Custom-Design of Strong Electron/Proton Extractor on COFs for Efficient Photocatalytic H2O2 Production.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2024, 63, e202320218. Google Scholar
- 28. Xu H.; Tao S.; Jiang D.Proton Conduction in Crystalline and Porous Covalent Organic Frameworks.Nat. Mater.2016, 15, 722–726. Google Scholar
- 29. Zhu L.; Zhu H.; Wang L.; Lei J.; Liu J.Efficient Proton Conduction in Porous and Crystalline Covalent-Organic Frameworks (COFs).J.?Energy Chem.2023, 82, 198–218. Google Scholar
- 30. Yin M.; Wang L.; Tang S.Amino-Functionalized Ionic-Liquid-Grafted Covalent Organic Frameworks for High-Efficiency CO2 Capture and Conversion.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces2022, 14, 55674–55685. Google Scholar
- 31. Lee W. R.; Hwang S. Y.; Ryu D. W.; Lim K. S.; Han S. S.; Moon D.; Choi J.; Hong C. S.Diamine-Functionalized Metal–Organic Framework: Exceptionally High CO2 Capacities from Ambient Air and Flue Gas, Ultrafast CO2 Uptake Rate, and Adsorption Mechanism.Energy Environ. Sci.2014, 7, 744–751. Google Scholar
- 32. Ai L.-Y.; Wang Q.; Chen X.-W.; Jiang G.-F.Cheap Transition Metal Reinforced Donor–Acceptor Covalent Organic Frameworks for CO2 Photoreduction.Chem. Eng. J.2023, 475, 146106. Google Scholar
- 33. Zhou S.; Wang M.; Wei S.; Wang Z.; Liu S.; Lawrence Wu C.-M.; Sun D.; Lu X.Precise Regulation of CO2 Packing Pattern in S-Block Metal Doped Single-Layer Covalent Organic Frameworks for High-Performance CO2 Capture and Separation.Chem. Eng. J.2022, 441, 135903. Google Scholar
- 34. Zhang H.; Liu S.; Wang L.; Fang H.; Yue X.; Wang Z.; Wei S.; Liu S.; Lu X.Ultrahigh Performance CO2 Capture and Separation in Alkali Metal Anchored 2D-COF.Sep. Purif. Technol.2024, 333, 125937. Google Scholar
- 35. Huang N.; Chen X.; Krishna R.; Jiang D.Two-Dimensional Covalent Organic Frameworks for Carbon Dioxide Capture through Channel-Wall Functionalization.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2015, 54, 2986–2990. Google Scholar
- 36. Ding Y.; Zhu W.-H.; Xie Y.Development of Ion Chemosensors Based on Porphyrin Analogues.Chem. Rev.2017, 117, 2203–2256. Google Scholar
- 37. Lee C. Y.; Farha O. K.; Hong B. J.; Sarjeant A. A.; Nguyen S. T.; Hupp J. T.Light-Harvesting Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs): Efficient Strut-To-Strut Energy Transfer in Bodipy and Porphyrin-Based MOFs.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2011, 133, 15858–15861. Google Scholar
- 38. Liu W.; Li X.; Wang C.; Pan H.; Liu W.; Wang K.; Zeng Q.; Wang R.; Jiang J.A Scalable General Synthetic Approach Toward Ultrathin Imine-Linked Two-Dimensional Covalent Organic Framework Nanosheets for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2019, 141, 17431–17440. Google Scholar
- 39. Gong Y.-N.; Zhong W.; Li Y.; Qiu Y.; Zheng L.; Jiang J.; Jiang H.-L.Regulating Photocatalysis by Spin-State Manipulation of Cobalt in Covalent Organic Frameworks.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2020, 142, 16723–16731. Google Scholar
- 40. Wu Y.; Jiang J.; Weng Z.; Wang M.; Broere D. L. J.; Zhong Y.; Brudvig G. W.; Feng Z.; Wang H.Electroreduction of CO2 Catalyzed by a Heterogenized Zn–Porphyrin Complex with a Redox-Innocent Metal Center.ACS Cent. Sci.2017, 3, 847–852. Google Scholar
- 41. Kim H.; Shin D.; Yang W.; Won D. H.; Oh H.-S.; Chung M. W.; Jeong D.; Kim S. H.; Chae K. H.; Ryu J. Y.; Lee J.; Cho S. J.; Seo J.; Kim H.; Choi C. H.Identification of Single-Atom Ni Site Active toward Electrochemical CO2 Conversion to CO.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2021, 143, 925–933. Google Scholar
- 42. Yuan H.; Krishna A.; Wei Z.; Su Y.; Chen J.; Hua W.; Zheng Z.; Song D.; Mu Q.; Pan W.; Xiao L.; Yan J.; Li G.; Yang W.; Deng Z.; Peng Y.Ligand-Bound CO2 as a Nonclassical Route Toward Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction with a Ni N-Confused Porphyrin.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2024, 146, 10550–10558. Google Scholar
- 43. Bielefeld M. J.; Fitts D. D.Bonding Contribution of Sulfur D Orbitals in Thiophene. An Extension of the Self-Consistent Field Molecular Orbital Method.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.1966, 88, 4804–4810. Google Scholar
- 44. Náray-Szabó G.; Peterson M. R.d-Orbital Participation in Bonding in Thiophene: Comparison of CNDO/2 and Ab Initio Results.J.?Mol. Struct.-Theochem.1981, 85, 249–255. Google Scholar
- 45. Zhang S.; Ocheje M. U.; Huang L.; Galuska L.; Cao Z.; Luo S.; Cheng Y.-H.; Ehlenberg D.; Goodman R. B.; Zhou D.; Liu Y.; Chiu Y.-C.; Azoulay J. D.; Rondeau-Gagné S.; Gu X.The Critical Role of Electron-Donating Thiophene Groups on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Donor–Acceptor Semiconducting Polymers.Adv. Electron. Mater.2019, 5, 1800899. Google Scholar
- 46. Liu R.; Chen Y.; Yu H.; Polo?ij M.; Guo Y.; Sum T. C.; Heine T.; Jiang D.Linkage-Engineered Donor–Acceptor Covalent Organic Frameworks for Optimal Photosynthesis of Hydrogen Peroxide from Water and Air.Nat. Catal.2024, 7, 195–206. Google Scholar
- 47. Zhuang X.; Zhao W.; Zhang F.; Cao Y.; Liu F.; Bi S.; Feng X.A Two-Dimensional Conjugated Polymer Framework with Fully sp2-Bonded Carbon Skeleton.Polym. Chem.2016, 7, 4176–4181. Google Scholar
- 48. Chen R.; Shi J.-L.; Ma Y.; Lin G.; Lang X.; Wang C.Designed Synthesis of a 2D Porphyrin-Based sp2 Carbon-Conjugated Covalent Organic Framework for Heterogeneous Photocatalysis.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2019, 58, 6430–6434. Google Scholar
- 49. Mu?oz M.; Argoul P.; Farges F. O.Continuous Cauchy Wavelet Transform Analyses of EXAFS Spectra: A Qualitative Approach.Am. Mineral.2003, 88, 694–700. Google Scholar
- 50. Zhong W.; Sa R.; Li L.; He Y.; Li L.; Bi J.; Zhuang Z.; Yu Y.; Zou Z.A Covalent Organic Framework Bearing Single Ni Sites as a Synergistic Photocatalyst for Selective Photoreduction of CO2 to CO.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2019, 141, 7615–7621. Google Scholar
- 51. Wang X.-Z.; Meng S.-L.; Chen J.-Y.; Wang H.-X.; Wang Y.; Zhou S.; Li X.-B.; Liao R.-Z.; Tung C.-H.; Wu L.-Z.Mechanistic Insights into Iron(II) Bis(Pyridyl)Amine-Bipyridine Skeleton for Selective CO2 Photoreduction.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2021, 60, 26072–26079. Google Scholar
- 52. Donadt T. B.; Lilio A. M.; Stinson T. A.; Lama B.; Luca O. R.DOSY?NMR and Normal Pulse Voltammetry for the Expeditious Determination of Number of Electrons Exchanged in Redox Events.ChemistrySelect2018, 3, 7410–7415. Google Scholar
- 53. Wu Z.-Y.; Wang T.; Meng Y.-S.; Rao Y.; Wang B.-W.; Zheng J.; Gao S.; Zhang J.-L.Enhancing the Reactivity of Nickel(II) in Hydrogen Evolution Reactions (HERs) by β-Hydrogenation of Porphyrinoid Ligands.Chem. Sci.2017, 8, 5953–5961. Google Scholar
- 54. Loipersberger M.; Cabral D. G. A.; Chu D. B. K.; Head-Gordon M.Mechanistic Insights into Co and Fe Quaterpyridine-Based CO2 Reduction Catalysts: Metal–Ligand Orbital Interaction as the Key Driving Force for Distinct Pathways.J.?Am. Chem. Soc.2021, 143, 744–763. Google Scholar
- 55. Venkatesh Y.; Venkatesan M.; Ramakrishna B.; Bangal P. R.Ultrafast Time-Resolved Emission and Absorption Spectra of Meso-Pyridyl Porphyrins Upon Soret Band Excitation Studied by Fluorescence Up-Conversion and Transient Absorption Spectroscopy.J.?Phys. Chem. B2016, 120, 9410–9421. Google Scholar
- 56. Follmer A. H.; Luedecke K. M.; Hadt R. G.M-Oxo Dimerization Effects on Ground- and Excited-State Properties of a Water-Soluble Iron Porphyrin CO2 Reduction Catalyst.Inorg. Chem.2022, 61, 20493–20500. Google Scholar
- 57. Xin Z.-K.; Huang M.-Y.; Wang Y.; Gao Y.-J.; Guo Q.; Li X.-B.; Tung C.-H.; Wu L.-Z.Reductive Carbon-Carbon Coupling on Metal Sites Regulates Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction in Water Using ZnSe Quantum Dots.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2022, 61, e202207222. Google Scholar